Growing up to ourselves & growing into our gifts

41e9cc9716fb446780fbdd7cd488e365“Is my IQ okay?”

“More than okay.”

“What is it?”

“I’m not going to tell you. But it assures me that both you and Charles Wallace will be able to do pretty much whatever you like when you grow up to yourselves. You just wait till Charles Wallace starts to talk. You’ll see.”

–conversation between Meg Murry and her mother in Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time

I find this phrase of Mrs. Murry’s telling: When you grow up to yourselves.  Grow up “to” yourselves, rather than simply “grow up.” What does she mean?

I think she means that, while both children are intelligent, they are still children. Their adult selves will realize the implications of the gift of profound intelligence: the responsibilities, the joys and benefits, the need to use their lives to help—not harm—society, and how to handle those who don’t understand them. They will be able to separate who they are as individual people from what they do as intellectually gifted people.

Right now, Meg is a young girl who doesn’t know who she is. Being told her IQ wouldn’t tell her who she is, nor who she will be. It’s just a number. And one number cannot express the full measure of a person’s intellect, much less the full measure of a person’s self.

Mrs. Murry tells her just enough—you’ll be fine—to counteract the lies of those at school who believe Meg is stupid because she doesn’t “do” math the “right” way.

She does it her way because she’s brilliant and understands it at a different level than her teachers. This doesn’t endear her to the teacher or administrator, who don’t appreciate her abilities in math nor her inability to explain herself. (That’s a different post.)

It might be tempting for Mrs. Murry to hop in her car, drive to the school, and chew out those dimwitted, clueless teachers. Because, obviously, if they’ve scolded her brilliant child, then they’re at fault.

Never mind that they are authority figures and therefore should be respected for their position, even if they haven’t earned that respect with their actions. (A lesson that Meg, in her immaturity, hasn’t yet learned.)

Never mind that often, we have to jump through seemingly pointless hoops to do something. (Another lesson Meg hasn’t learned. Sometimes you just need to roll your eyes, jump through the hoop, and do it the “right” way, no matter how frustrating that is, because that’s how you move forward to a place where you can do it your way.)

Never mind that Meg is still a physical child. She isn’t an adult, and she doesn’t need her mother to allow her to act like an adult (minus the average adult’s life experience) in this situation. She doesn’t have the life experience to put this one incident in a broader perspective.

It’s a bit like what a literary agent has written about extremely young wannabe authors; they may be terrific, gifted writers, but the majority of teenagers don’t have the life experience to write a publishable novel. It can happen. But it’s highly unusual.

(I’ll second this as a short story submission reader. The young authors like to tell me how old they are, and some write good stories compared with their same-aged peers. But how can a sixteen-year-old compete with a someone who has been writing professionally longer than the teen has been alive? So, young writers, keep writing, keep submitting—it’s good practice—and keep learning. Then, when you do have some more life experience, you’ll be ready for whatever story you want to write. Okay, that’s enough advice from Granny Laura.)

Recently, I’ve been kicking around this idea:

With personal gifts, it’s a blessing to find success at an older age versus a younger one.  

The more I’ve read about “gifted children”—so-called prodigies and such—I find something sad about many of them. It’s a double-edged sword.

On the one hand, there are astonishing achievements.

On the other, for some, their “giftedness” overwhelms their existence. Their gift is their entire identity. They aren’t allowed to be children because the surrounding adults focus on “the gift” to the exclusion of all else and the child doesn’t have the maturity to separate “who I am” from “what I can do.” This can lead to a number of negative outcomes.

But if, like Mrs. Murry, the parent allows the gifted child to be a child, to be cherished for who she is (no matter how odd she appears to others), to struggle from the cocoon of immaturity and emerge into adulthood all the stronger for having struggled—if the parent does that, the child has a chance to grow up to her self (who I am) and to separate it from her gift (what I do). That’s eventually what happens to Meg.

As someone who doesn’t have a Meg-sized intellect (and definitely not a Charles Wallace-sized one!), it’s still interesting to think of the ways I’ve grown in my abilities. For example, I don’t think I was ready to write a novel until I was thirty. I’d tried before, once as a teenager and once as a new college graduate, but the stories were weak.

I wasn’t ready until after my diagnosis with bipolar disorder, two pregnancies, secondary infertility, a miscarriage, any number of medication changes and bipolar swings, and all the things that happened during my twenties. Looking back at that first draft of that first novel, I torn between cringing and laughing. Really? Did I really write that? Did I really think that was going to work?

Yeah. I did.

I know better now. Why? More experience, both in life and in novel-writing. I’ve grown up to myself, as Mrs. Murry phrases it, and I’ll undoubtedly keep growing more in the future.

 

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Growing up to ourselves & growing into our gifts

  1. You know you had me at the first line….
    I’ll tweet your post tonight or tomorrow a.m. so it gets the attention it deserves, as I already bombarded my loyal followers (not many, but they are cool!) this morning too many with tweets. I blame the additional caffeine I had to deal with the time change & waking up at 4:30 a.m. Well, not exactly “waking” — “zombie-ing” would be a more apt word if it existed.

    On a brighter note, I LOVE your post!!!!!!!!

    Warning – the photo of me with Madeleine L’Engle at Mount Calvary Monastery in the following post shows me
    with three chins.

    I only have two!

    https://proudlybipolar.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/madeleine-lengle-inspiration-on-writing-and-marriage/

    Like

  2. I can relate to what you’re saying here. I’ve often wished I could go back in time and teach myself lessons. Lately, though, I’ve been wondering what my young self would think about who I’ve become. Would I be disappointed or proud? I’m so far away from being that person that I don’t know.

    Like

  3. When I read “Charles Wallace” I had to read the rest. Love that book!! And, I love your post.. life experience matters a great deal!! I am so glad I am not where I was, or who I was at 20!! I have, as Mrs Murray says, grown into myself!! Finally!!!!!!

    Like

    1. One thing that’s interesting to me is that when I tried to read A Wrinkle in Time as a child, I didn’t care for it. I picked it up as an adult and loved it. Maybe I grew up to it?!

      P.S. I’m so thankful I’m not who I was at age 20, too! That wasn’t a great year in my life, but I’ve moved on. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I find that interesting- my kids are not interested in reading any of them, but I have and loved them!! Maybe they will as they grow older??

        Like

      1. Good news Laura – I belong to something on Twitter called paper.li – It’s kind of hard to me to explain it well/accurately, but it is a compilation of articles shared via Twitter that goes out to subscribers every few days on Twitter. The editor selects different tweets she likes & and your blog post via my tweet was selected! It’s even a headliner! here’s the link if you want to take a peek. The theme of this particular paper.li is postpartum (there are all kinds of themes under the moon) but the Postpartum Post always contains articles about many subjects, not just postpartum.

        http://paper.li/PostPartumPost/1390496652#!all

        Like

What do you think? I'd love to hear from you!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s